![]() Many people debate the viability of gold for any type of monetary uses; the usual suspects argue that because it doesn’t pay dividends, it pays no interest, its trading patterns are volatile, and it doesn’t “produce” anything, it should not be thought of as having any type of monetary use. I say that the very things that make gold so “boring” also qualify gold to be one of the most stable forms of money around. Never forget that gold IS money—it’s not just worth money, but it IS money. Gold has been the money of kings for thousands of years. Gold has INTRINSIC worth. The only currency systems that have ever proven to be relatively stable and sound have been gold-backed currency systems. What you’re currently seeing with gold hitting new highs every single year since the year 2000, is not so much the value of gold increasing as it is the value of the dollar decreasing. That’s a heavy thought, but it’s absolutely true. I know that there are all kinds of armchair economists that would love to weigh in on my thoughts, and they probably know way more about economics than I do, but I can go ahead and tell you that when our current fiat money system comes crashing down—as all fiat currencies ultimately do—I would much rather be holding physical gold bullion than a bunch of worthless pieces of green paper. Home | Articles | Links |